【】thinkoflawasan</p>
abstratity,butasaflexiblequantityasitshouldbepersonallyappliedtolonel</p>
<lapersonalenoughtorespondto</p>
thepersonalityoflonelhuangorjorliisinhunandthereforenolaall.</p>
esejusticeisanart,notasce.</p>
1thisrefers,ofurse,togeneralanhoodasbroughtaboutbythepresentsocial</p>
syste</p>
jespersen,inhishandstructureofenglish,once</p>
referredtothesequalitiesoftheenglishlanguagebypointingtoitsloveof</p>
eno,nsenseandforcefulness.houtontradictsogreatan</p>
authorityojitheenglishlanguage,ibegtodifferonapointhesexes.</p>
nsehepraharasofenratherthanof</p>
n,oreliabletotaketheirfeetoffthegroundandsoartoiossible</p>
heights.theeselanguageandgraarshoinilybecausethe</p>
language,initsforsyntaxandvocabulary,revealsaresilicityof</p>
thinking,nageryandenoofsyntaalrelationships.</p>
thissilicityisbestillustratedfroidgihese</p>
bones,ase,youno</p>
e;youe,henoe”shouldnotbensideredasclearasthere</p>
roundabout”youe,ifhees,andhe.e,ifyoue.”in</p>
faoon,indeansenglish,quotes</p>
anenglishsorsetfarrastestifyingbeforethejudge:”hedastidheda</p>
stidhelickedhe,andhelickedhe;ifhelickedheashardashelickedhe,heda</p>
killedhe,andnothehe,”andthisseetoachresensiblealking</p>
thanoneaniasedistins.ftotheese,the</p>
differeplex,andtheaddingofthethirdpersonsingularending”s”</p>
isassuperfluousasisalreadyprovedtobeitenseihad,hehad;i,he</p>
things”houtever</p>
beingsuoodorlosinganythingexceptaaningless”class”hhas</p>
nothingtodohthebeautyofexpression.ihavegreathopethatenglishand</p>
ariprofessorsablypronouncea”hedont”in</p>
thesandthattheenglishlanguageyonedaybeeassensibleand</p>
clearastheese,throughtheinfluenceofpidgin.</p>
acertainfenineprathasalreadyguidedtheenglishtoabbreviateall</p>
theirsubordinatehaspossible,like”itting5”god</p>
ed”ifidontnotshallnot</p>
ebaightand”ifnotshallbreakoutweek.”</p>
jespersenalreadyntionssuplicityinenglishas”first</p>
e,firstserved”nocure,nopay,””oen,tandard</p>
pidgin.theyarebeginningtodropthe”,”too”o”.</p>